Tuesday, 22 December 2009

Concluding remarks - It is so decided

This has certainly has been two interesting weeks. For all the COP15 delegates, for the Copenhagen, for media, for the world and for me. We knew on forehand that it would be tricky to seal an ambitious deal and everything would have to walk hand in hand, and in the right pace, in order to get it done. Looking back, we can see that there was a number of events that went wrong. I will in the end of my post provide you with some links to other analysis so you can see what it looks like in a few selected media. But this is my analysis:

1. The UN system
It is a very rigid system, as usual with UN negotiations. You have to reach consensus in order to advance and if a few countries starts to obstruct, they will set the pace and run the business. The negotiations were also restricted to follow the Bali Action Plan, a roadmap set up two years ago to guide the work towards a new climate agreement.

2. Denmark lacking "fingerspitzgefühl"
You have to be aware that cultural differences are very much present in these kind of negotiations. The first major drawback was when the Developing countries started to feel neglected by the Danish COP presidency. Connie Hedegaard wanted to move quickly and a couple of creative new approaches to a deal started to surface early in week one. The G77 felt side-stepped and made this a democracy issue. If they weren't allowed to participate in the anticipated way, they would start to make trouble.... And they did. And precious time was lost.

3. No chance for "Obama effect".
He, and the other heads of state, had no real chance to resque the process, arriving only in the very final hours of the negotiations. In order for that to happen, the overall situation would have been needed to be less chaotic and an "almost-ready" deal was far from available at that time.

4. Some countries lacking real will for a deal.
The U.S. delegation had too low a bid to contribute with when they arrived, which made them look defensive from start, although the retorics differed quite a bit from that. China had long ago stated that an international binding agreement could not involve them to any significant extent.

So, how does this affect companies like Sweco? Well, Sweco shares the view that was stated by the global business community during the negotiations: An ambitious, clear and longterm deal is needed, would be very beneficial, and that companies play an important role for mitigating and adapting to climate change. At Sweco, we work with sustainable development in all our fields of expertise and clear targets, financial support and technology transfer would strengthen our mission. However, we do not see this as the end of the world, and Sweco is also providing services regarding adaptation to climate change, which will have to be dealt with even more now, lacking the deal that almost everyone wanted. There are also clear signs of a global shift present in Copenhagen that indicates that regardless the outcome of COP15, there are many countries, cities, companies and organisations that will do their share and help society to restructure in a sustainable direction, regardless of the COP15 outcome.

In conclusion, I'm disappointed but not disillusioned. There will also be new opportunities to success further down the road.

More to read:

Some analysis from The Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/21/copenhagen-climate-compromise
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/20/copenhagen-summit-pact-obama-verdict
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/19/copenhagen-closes-weak-deal
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/18/how-copenhagen-text-was-changed
http://www.berlingske.dk/klima/nu-bliver-verden-varmere
http://www.berlingske.dk/klima/24-timers-globalt-politisk-teater
http://www.wbcsd.org/plugins/DocSearch/details.asp?type=DocDet&ObjectId=MzY5ODg


Press conference before and after.
And what really happened.....

This will be my final post on this blog. Thank you all for following it thank you for all the positive feedback that we have got during these two weeks. Do not hesitate to contact any of us (fornamn.efternamn@sweco.se), do you wish to have more information on how Sweco is working with climate related business. You can also use the Sweco portal email climatehelpdesk@sweco.se. Let's all have a very merry christmas and a prosperous new 2010!
Andreas

Saturday, 19 December 2009

The Copenhagen Accord


was the final document that came out of COP15. You can read it here.
The COP was finally closed an hour ago with hand clapping by the delegates that were not sleeping in the plenum.
25 countries and the EU have adopted the Copenhagen Accord. I'll get back with an in-depth analysis of the Accord tomorrow. Even observers have to sleep, you know :-)
Andreas, on the night train back to Jämtland.

Friday, 18 December 2009

Deal or not?

http://en.cop15.dk/news/view+news?newsid=3066

Deal or no deal? I am impressed that environmental issues and green solutions have been in focus for so long! In some senses you can talk of sucess! It might not been written on a contract, but leaders must see the good business in a sustainable and functional environment. We must not forget all of the promising ideas that comes when people are forced to cope with real threaths! There are no nemesis, but all have seen Hybris!

A very small step for mankind but a giant leap for mistrust in leaders

So, things are clearing up after the final battle here in Copenhagen. And the winners are...
Nobody.
What do we know?
- The only deal presented is the weak "non-binding agreement" between USA, China, South Africa and India. There is still confusion whether more countries are in that Copenhagen Accord.
- The EU tried to continue all through the night but without any success. Reinfeldt were clearly disappointed noting that some countries even have pulled back their ambitions relative to where they were before COP15.
- Tuvalu raised a "point of order" card in the night session forcing Denmark to stop the process and thereby enabling several of the G77 countries to cry out their dismay over the devastating results.
- There is probably a new meeting in Bonn within six months.
To conclude, COP15 was a winding road that in the final phase played havoc with the world.
So why did it all fail? Well, I have to (and I will) get back to that in my final post later on.
Are there any small positives signs from Copenhagen to bring home for christmas? Well, certainly. Many of the presented initiatives will march on towards a more sustainable society no matter the outcome of COP15. Many people from around the world have made new contacts and started to cooperate on matters important to their future. And no deal, which this could be seen as, might be better than a weak deal.

Let's think a while about that while the fog dissolves around Bella Center and then we will have a clearer view of the outcome.
/Andreas

Obama's going home...

The last 6 hours have been incredibly turbulent. Apparently things are now dissolving and no agreement will be made.
See all action at:
http://www.berlingske.dk/cop15-opdateringer/obama-forlader-bella-centeret-uden-erklaering

I'll get back with analysis later on.
/Andreas




- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Location:Kvægtorvsgade,Köpenhamn,Danmark

No deal

Sorry folks. We're in for a crash.
More on that later.
Maybe no deal is better than a weak deal.
/Andreas



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Location:Gasværksvej,Köpenhamn,Danmark

No strong deal in Copenhagen - Sweco will continue to deliver

We are in the final turbulent hours and a stong agreement seems impossible. There are too many unresolved issues, too much different views on targets but more importantly on procedural matters. Who is going to write and what? Latest news is that the COP15 might be prolonged through the weekend ending on Sunday.
There is a chance of a political agreement without binding targets or measures, but with parties stating their firm commitment (which they actually already have...). Anyhow:
Rest assure that, no matter the outcome of COP15, Sweco will continue to deliver solutions to mitigate and adapt to climate change, in Sweden, Europe and world wide. We firmly believe in sustainable development and will actively contribute to it.
Andreas